Cookies Disclaimer

I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to authenticate logins, deliver better content and provide statistical analysis. You can adjust your browser settings to prevent our site from using cookies, but doing so will prevent some aspects of the site from functioning properly.

All posts created by Elsworth Sugarfoot

Elsworth Sugarfoot
game needs an entire overhaul of combat mechanics and animations to bring it up to date with the competition. tab targeting needs to go away entirely. That's not how we do things anymore.
Elsworth Sugarfoot
I should note that this bundle does have 1 lien of the first Tier 3 psychic staff produced to one Elsworth Sugarfoot.
Elsworth Sugarfoot
I plan to have captured all the Elder Scrolls and have the Emperor crown ready for you when you return.
Elsworth Sugarfoot
You mean coitus?
Elsworth Sugarfoot
am i the only one who thought of this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwZshlE3HUA&index=4&list=PLI1zuZdCSlNaRpfJfFU3D5NhHq6gXLNGP
Elsworth Sugarfoot
I will probably follow ZomoZ wherever he goes and then try and usurp your power. Just ask Phy, I've been trying to dethrone him for months.
Elsworth Sugarfoot
Nihimon
No "win" condition - same problem Duffy eloquently described very, very early in EE. And there's still no "win" condition other than harassing your enemies into not playing/posting.
This is actually a huge problem, and I've always felt that GW chickened out on having consequences, especially when it came to level support. With the WoT everyone was given tier2 even if they held no towers, mostly due to small inactive settlements crying about how it was impossible to get towers (hint: Don't be a small inactive settlement). Now with Bulk resources everyone is level 20????? Ridiculous. It's should be dropped to 0. You should have to pay those bulk resources every week to to have that support. Also currently settlement capture is basically impossible if the defender is at all active. Bulk resources are flush and no one will ever run out. Even if they do the rest of the map will probably be more than happy to sell them some.

They could also never fully implement character reputations effecting your DI. I always thought having 2 alts on every account was just an invitation to game the system.
Elsworth Sugarfoot
How is placing a small holding in a hex and farming an escalation an attack? That was something you wanted to break the truce over? You didn't try any diplomacy at all, you went straight for the military option, which we were more than happy to oblige.
Elsworth Sugarfoot
Honestly, why do you need a solution to company hopping. Beinon got tired of losing? Phaeros didn't have enough players to defend? If they had more players or were better then he could have taken a night off. It only takes 1 victory every 3 nights at a time of your choosing to defend your holding anyway.
Elsworth Sugarfoot
Jesus, it's like you guys have never used the internet before, or done anything competitive whatsoever.

Just because there's an argument or opposing viewpoints doesn't mean something is "toxic." Going around agreeing with everyone and holding everything back because you don't want to upset anyone is toxic, because in the end that will blow up. Thinking you can just roll around and do whatever you want and are entitled to everything you desire is toxic. Running to the devs every time someone does something you don't like is clearly toxic.

Fighting over territory, resources, recruits, bragging rights, that's just competition. Political propaganda and controlling the public perception of your image and that of your alliance is just par for the course in strategy and empire building games.

If make a bunch of announcements saying "We are the biggest, best, we are the awesomest!!!!" You can expect someone to come along and compete against you and then declare victory when you lose.